are you trying to suggest that it ISN'T hyprocritical?
when are you going to post your potshots?
Printable View
are you trying to suggest that it ISN'T hyprocritical?
when are you going to post your potshots?
Making a claim WITHOUT evidence IS potshotting, if the claim is derogatory towards another.
Well it's clear that Shatzy has kidnapped this topic. Soulfilms was going to post something of value, until Shatzy stepped in.
please don't try to sidestep the issue with one
of your usual ploys, alex.
i am asking you... and have asked you since the
bigging of this thread... to post your own potshots
you have made to other people.
i realize that with your last post here, you
are attempting to get SF to do the 'dirty work'
for you... as i have seen this ploy performed
many times before.
and EVERYTIME you have used it... it works.
i simply do not understand why you refuse to
answer the request. there is no logical explination
for this kind of behavior.. unless that explination
leads to further hypocrisy....
Your tactics and ploys are an attempt to circumvent the primary purpose of this topic post.
I started this topic, I discovered, evaluated and defined what I think a potshot is. It appears you have a desire to hijack this topic post and make it fit your missive, which is a form of a potshot.
You have possibley interfered with Soul films, who had potentially valuable input to give, and has yet to give it. That has now become an additional potshot, interfering with the progress of others who are communicating.
There is plenty of time and topic post space to have your discussion. Your agenda need not happen on this particular topic thread, but your agenda can still happen.
<font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ February 22, 2003 05:14 PM: Message edited by: Super-8mm in the DigitalAge ]</font>
i'm sorry. i failed to read your complete post.
i got as far as your first sentence... which is
complete BS and you know it.
i merely went in time with the original thread
topic to ask you to supply 'potshots' that you
have given to other people.
now you claim that i have attempted to 'hijack'
the thread for blah blah blah...
you can't be this dense.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by shatzy:
i'm sorry. i failed to read your complete post.
</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>
Which means you aren't sorry.
of course i'm not sorry.
i laughed as i typed it.
keep up.
Keep up? You claim to have only read one sentence, I commented on that one sentence. Not much to keep up with really.
You choose to be either a menace or a minus.
just so we're clear.
shatzy and i did not have any covert agreements for me to refrain from posting. i chose not to do it on my own accord.
ok.
resume.